OSLO, Norway, July 23, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Public trust in health innovation may be less predictable than healthcare organizations assume, according to new research from DNV, the independent assurance and certification provider.

A global survey of 12,500 people across 17 countries found that mindset is a stronger indicator of trust than traditional demographic factors such as age, income or geography.

The findings, published in DNV's new report The Future of Health: Four mindsets shaping trust, innovation and care challenge conventional approaches to audience segmentation and identify four distinct trust mindsets that influence how people evaluate healthcare, innovation and the future of care.

With health ecosystems facing growing pressure from ageing populations, workforce shortages and rapidly advancing technologies, understanding what builds public confidence will become critical.

Contrary to popular belief, the report finds that trust cannot be explained through demographics alone. People with similar demographic profiles can hold very different attitudes towards innovation and the future of health. The report identified four distinct mindsets of people building trust in healthcare: Trusting Optimists, Human Connectors, Evidence Evaluators and Pragmatic Realists.  

While Trusting Optimists are inclined to embrace new technologies that promise better outcomes and access to care, Human Connectors judge innovation through the lens of personal relationships and compassionate care. Evidence Evaluators look for transparency, accountability and proof that innovations deliver on their promises. The largest group identified in the research was Pragmatic Realists, people who judge innovation less by how advanced it is and more by whether it improves access, affordability and healthcare outcomes.

What makes these mindsets particularly significant is that they cut across traditional demographic boundaries. While age, income, health status and location all influence attitudes towards healthcare, they do not fully explain how people build trust. The research found, people with similar demographic profiles often belong to different trust mindsets, while people from very different backgrounds frequently share similar views on innovation and the future of care.

The findings also challenge common assumptions about age and technology. While older people are often viewed as more resistant to innovation and younger generations as more naturally accepting, the research suggests attitudes are shaped less by age than by people's experience of healthcare.

Across all four mindsets, one finding stood out. Nearly two-thirds of respondents, expressed concern that healthcare could become less personal as technology adoption accelerates, highlighting a shared expectation that innovation should strengthen and not replace the human experience of care.

The research suggests that people do not embrace innovation simply because it is new. Rather, confidence grows when technology is developed responsibly, assessed rigorously and implemented with patient outcomes in mind.

"Healthcare has never been innovating faster. But innovation alone won't determine the future of healthcare, trust will. Many assume trust is determined by age, gender or social status. Our research shows it's far more nuanced than that. Demographics influence trust, but do not define it." said Geir Fuglerud, CEO - Life Sciences at DNV. "The four mindsets we identify show that people build confidence in different ways, yet they share one important expectation: Technology should strengthen healthcare, not replace human care." 

The report The Future of Health: Four mindsets shaping trust, innovation and care is available to download here.

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/public-trust-in-health-innovation-is-shaped-more-by-mindset-than-demographics-dnv-research-finds-302833319.html

Im Streit um die Behandlung sogenannter Heavy User im Mobilfunk hat das nordrhein-westfälische Oberverwaltungsgericht (OVG) die Bundesnetzagentur vorläufig in die Schranken gewiesen. Die Bonner Aufsichtsbehörde hatte einem bundesweit tätigen Mobilfunkanbieter untersagt, Kunden mit unbegrenztem oder sehr großem Datenvolumen bei überlasteten Funkzellen mit geringerer Priorität zu bedienen. Diese Form der sogenannten Depriorisierung darf nach der einstweiligen OVG-Entscheidung vorerst weiter angewendet werden. Der Beschluss im Eilverfahren ist nicht anfechtbar.

Nach Auffassung des 13. Senats ist derzeit offen, ob die entsprechende Vertragsklausel des Anbieters mit europäischem Recht vereinbar ist. Im Kern geht es um die Frage, ob eine nachrangige Behandlung von Vielnutzern eine nicht gerechtfertigte Ungleichbehandlung von Kunden darstellt. Bevor in der Hauptsache entschieden wird, will das OVG Münster den Europäischen Gerichtshof (EuGH) um eine Vorabentscheidung bitten. Damit wird der Konflikt um Datenpriorisierung und Netzmanagement auf die europäische Ebene verlagert.

Gegenstand des Verfahrens ist insbesondere, ob der Datentransport datenintensiver Anwendungen wie hochauflösendem Videostreaming während einer Netzüberlastung eingeschränkt oder verlangsamt werden darf. Der betroffene Mobilfunkanbieter sieht dies in seinen Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen vor, um Kapazitäten in ausgelasteten Funkzellen zu steuern. Die Bundesnetzagentur hatte angeordnet, dass diese Klausel nicht umgesetzt werden darf und damit faktisch einen Riegel vor entsprechende Maßnahmen gegen Heavy User geschoben.

In der Vorinstanz hatte sich die Bundesnetzagentur noch durchgesetzt: Das Verwaltungsgericht Köln hatte die Position der Behörde bestätigt. Das OVG änderte diese Entscheidung nun (Az. 13 B 1232/25) und gab dem Anbieter im Eilverfahren Recht. Mit der geplanten Vorlage an den EuGH dürfte der Fall Signalwirkung für die Auslegung europäischer Vorgaben zur Gleichbehandlung von Internetverkehr und zu den Spielräumen der Netzbetreiber beim Umgang mit stark belasteten Mobilfunkzellen entfalten.